Ultrasonic Cavitation vs Coolsculpting, Which Is Better ?
by Ultrasonic Cavitation vs Coolsculpting
Affiliate Disclosure ...
THIS PAGE MAY CONTAIN AFFILIATE LINKS, MEANING WE RECEIVE A COMMISSION IF YOU DECIDE TO MAKE A PURCHASE VIA OUR LINKS, THERE IS NO COST TO YOU ... PLEASE READ OUR FULL DISCLOSURE FOR MORE INFO ... THANK YOU!
Posted on 10-06-2020 06:07 PM
Ultrasonic Cavitation vs Coolsculpting
ultrasonic cavitation vs coolsculpting is probably what many people will debate on if you are considering to remove fat or shape your body. Well, here is some views you can read, to help you determine which option is best for you.
When you think about coolsculpting, you probably imagine a technician blasting fat with cold air. Using cryolipolysis technology, coolsculpting lowers fat cells to 39 ° f(4 ° c), which crystallizes them and enables the body to eliminate fat cells naturally. Coolsculpting is among the most well-researched body contouring options out there, so it's efficacy is proven to a higher degree than ultrasonic cavitation.
Both procedures are comfortable, non-invasive, and pain-free.
Our last decision much like you're making an assessment on which fat removal procedure is the best fit for you, we also did our own comparison of treatments on the market to ensure we offered the most effective treatments to our clients to help them look their best. Although coolsculpting was a more acknowledged name, ultrasonic fat cavitation was clearly the much better option for our clients.
Lipo cavitation was established as a non-surgical alternative to liposuction. Lipo cavitation is an fda-approved, non-surgical, fat-reduction option that utilizes ultrasound to break up fat under the skin. The fat is liquified, taken in into the body and expelled naturally. The procedure is easy in regards to application. A gel is applied to the skin to serve as a channel. The ultrasonic waves are adjusted to a frequency that only treats fat, so, unlike liposuction, there is no risk of damaging other components within the body. Each session lasts about thirty minutes to an hour, and results can be seen practically immediately. An added benefit of lipo cavitation is that there are no fda limits to where you can use it on the body. The most common feedback, besides nearly instant results, is that lipo cavitation is more comfortable than coolsculpting. The smaller price tag doesn't harmed either.
When it comes to the various treatments readily available it is simple to get a little lost in regards to understanding what's offered. This is especially the case when various treatment types can target a similar body area and achieve similar results, however in different ways. Two such treatments are ultrasonic cavitation and coolsculpting. Here we describe how the two procedures work and what they can accomplish.
What about coolsculpting? coolsculpting is another kind of noninvasive fat reduction procedure that reduces fat cells. This procedure is highly recommended by skin specialists because it decreases body fat by 20%. One of the primary differences from ultrasonic cavitation is that coolsculpting is based on cryolipolysis-- utilizing cold temperatures to freeze and eliminate the fat cells. This procedure is mostly used to treat areas that have been unresponsive to diet and exercise; those areas of stubborn fat!.
What is better fat cavitation or fat freezing?
Fat cavitation vs fat freezing is actually the same as Ultrasonic Cavitation vs Coolsculpting. Arguably the fastest growing category when it comes to non-surgical treatments (after injectables naturally) is body sculpting-- from fat freezing and fat melting (for instance coolsculpting or sculpsure), to newer treatments on the market designed to improve muscle tone (like emsculpt). Regardless of all of the exciting brand-new options being released onto the marketplace over the previous 1-2 years, fat cavitation, or ultrasound cavitation, is still incredibly popular, regardless of having been around for many years and being dubbed by lots of as the more affordable, less effective method of body sculpting and shaping.
To get some unbiased answers around its sustained popularity, we looked for the opinions of two professionals.
The first is Danielle Smith, director of elite body contouring, who use both ultrasound fat cavitation and new fat freezing technologies throughout their centers. The second is Lashana Shepherd, medical and training manager for the global beauty group, who disperse both fat cavitation and newer sculpting devices. Here's what they inform us on the appeal of fact cavitation vs newer fat melting models, and whether ultrasound cavitation still has a place in the modern-day clinic.
How does it differ/compare to other popular fat melting or freezing treatments? DS: Fat cavitation was among the first non-invasive procedures available to safely and successfully disappear stubborn fat without any surgery or downtime. The technology itself works to diminish stubborn fat cell that just will not move no matter diet and exercise, resulting in long term however not always permanent fat reduction-- regular upkeep is required. Other methods of non-surgical fat reduction procedures, such as cryolipolysis fat freezing and lipocel hifu body sculpting, destroy stubborn fat cells, resulting in permanent fat reduction and more accelerated results.
LS: Unlike treatments such as fat freezing where there is a maximum variety of treatments a customer can have, ultrasound fat cavitation can be performed as frequently as the client wishes. There are no treatment limitations because we're not ruining the fat cells-- we are simply shrinking them. It can also be used pre and post-liposuction to level swellings, bumps, etc.
29bodysculpting treatments are extremely popular at the moment with hardly any day spa or clinic not using some sort of fat-reducing service. While fat-freezing cryolipolysis, and fat-melting laser treatments can be very effective, they are on the costly side as well as needing a minimum of an hour of clients' time. A faster, less painful fat reducing treatment is ultrasound cavitation, which can literally be performed during your lunch break. However, it requires persistent post-treatment care in order to show visible results. Founder and director of lux allure, carly porter, describes the importance of her fat cavitation at-home after care plan:.
More indept into Ultrasonic Cavitation vs Coolsculpting ?
How Does CoolSculpting Remove Fat?
CoolSculpting removes fat by "freezing" fat cells, which successfully makes them collapse thus eliminating them. After these fat cells die, your body's other cell systems kick in to remove the dead fat cells. CoolSculpting is FDA-approved to work on just particular areas of the body: chin/jawline areas, thighs, abdomen, flanks, bra fat, back fat, underneath the buttocks, and upper arms.
How Does Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation Remove Fat?
Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation utilizes ultrasonic (high-frequency sound waves) to essentially liquefy fat cells. Your body's lymphatic system then kicks into equipment to remove these melted, dead fat cells. The handpiece utilized also contributes in shaping your target areas, "sculpting" and breaking down tissue to give you a slimmer appearance. Below we are going to highlight the key aspects of CoolSculpting vs Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation and designate a clear winner to each:.
Fewer Treatments To See Results?
Winner: Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation
According to the CoolSculpting website - it might use up to 1 to 3 months to see results. This is due to the fact that it takes time for the fat cells to be broken down by their proprietary freezing method and to be expelled from your body.
Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation, on the other hand, works within a matter of days. The fat cells are immediately liquefied by the ultrasonic waves and your body's lymphatic system kicks into gear to eliminate the dead fat cells right away.
Which is More Comfortable?
Winner: Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation
The CoolSculpting website states:"During the procedure, you might experience sensations of pulling, pulling, mild pinching, intense cold, tingling, stinging, hurting, and cramping at the treatment site. These sensations subside as the area ends up being numb. Following the procedure, typical side effects include temporary redness, swelling, blanching, bruising, firmness, tingling, stinging, tenderness, cramping, aching, itching, or skin sensitivity, and sensation of fullness in the back of the throat after submental or submandibular area treatment. "Yikes.
Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation, on the other hand, is pain-free. In fact, our clients have actually told us that Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation is a relaxing experience. There's no anesthesia needed, no cutting, and no sutures. That means no scars or downtime.
Which Has Less Downtime?
Winner: Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation
With Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation, you can return back to your daily regular routine immediately after the procedure. There's no requirement to take days off of work. Some of our clients even can be found in on their lunch breaks! That's because the procedure is painless, relaxing, and can be finished in an hour or less.
On the other hand, there can be lasting side-effects with CoolSculpting. Directly from the website, it states: Rare side effects may also happen. CoolSculpting ® may trigger a visible enlargement in the treated area which might develop two to five months after treatment and requires surgical intervention for correction.
Which Costs Less?
Winner: Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation
CoolSculpting can cost upwards of $500 and up per treatment - and you'll most likely need multiple treatments. Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation is typically 30% to 50% less, and just in case you require multiple treatments we're offering package deals like our buy one get one free deal. Therefore you can make the most of a total less cost-per-treatment AND bundled cost savings!.
Which is FDA-Approved?
Winner: Connect
Both CoolSculpting and Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation are FDA Approved. So regardless of which treatment you choose, you know that it's backed by rigorous testing and is generally safe for the majority of people.
Keep in mind: You should constantly speak with a doctor or licensed health professional prior to selecting among these treatments.
Which is More Popular?
Winner: CoolSculpting
CoolSculpting is owned by Allergan, a giant in the cosmetic procedures industry. Allergan has actually pumped millions into digital, TV, and radio campaigns to promote its procedure. Ultrasonic Fat Cavitation, which is a bit of a tongue-twister in itself, is rebranded by numerous medspas as their own name (Ultra-Cavi, LipoSculpt, etc. ). Nevertheless, the way that the treatment works, despite the differences in the name, is fundamentally the very same.
We hope the comparison between Ultrasonic Cavitation vs Coolsculpting would give you an informed decision but nevertheless, please consult your family doctor before taking the plunge..
